0/100

reclaimmiles.com

Good, with gaps — grade B

The basics hold. A few items are worth an afternoon.

1 failing 5 to improve 30 fine 37 checks · 19 Sep 2026 20:29

Each check carries a weight according to how much it affects visitors, ranking or legal exposure. A pass scores the full weight, a warning half, a failure nothing. The score is the total earned divided by the total available.

70th percentile of the last 23 sites checked here. Median is 83 — this site is above it.

-1 since 19 Sep 2026 (90 → 89)

The biggest problems

Security headersmissing HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, CSP These headers are what stops a visitor being downgraded to HTTP, stops the browser guessing file types, and limits what an injected script can do. They cost nothing and are the cheapest security you can add.

Google performance score88 / 100 overall · mobile 82 · desktop 99 Above 90 nobody notices the page loading. Below 50 they notice, and some of them leave before it finishes.

Performance on a phone82 / 100 · first paint 2.9 s · largest paint 3.7 s This is the device most of your visitors use and the version Google indexes first. Largest paint above 2.5 seconds is the threshold where people start giving up.

You are seeing 3 of 37 checks. Run the check yourself to open the full report — it explains what each one means and how to fix it.

Run your own scan

That was the technical part

What remains is what a machine cannot detect: whether a person understands in five seconds what you are selling, where they get stuck in onboarding, and whether the pricing makes sense.

Order an in-depth audit — $129

The check is automated and informative only. If you are the maker of reclaimmiles.com and want the report taken down, write to info@truetier.app and we will remove it.